首页> 外文OA文献 >Investment awards based on international law in conflict with European Union Law — The special case of the Micula award
【2h】

Investment awards based on international law in conflict with European Union Law — The special case of the Micula award

机译:基于与欧盟法相抵触的国际法的投资裁决— Micula裁决的特例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

CEE states, following their accession into the European Union in 2004 and 2007, have been inundated with numerous lawsuits by foreign and, in many cases, European investors in front of international tribunals. Some of these cases involved state aid provided by member states to investors and when these state aid measures were revoked, based on decision of the European institutions, the aggrieved investors turned to both EU instances and international arbitrations. These EU decisions forced CEE states to take certain measures, often by curtailing contractual rights awarded by CEE states to international or Western European investors. The investors tried to invalidate the European Commissions’ decisions in front of the EU Court of First Instance/General Court and subsequently in the Court of Justice. When these initiatives failed, the facts of these cases were subsequently represented by many of these investors in international fora, such as the International Centre for Settlement Investment Disputes (ICSID), or arbitrations organised under the UNCITRAL rules.\ud
机译:中欧和东欧国家在2004年和2007年加入欧盟后,已经被外国人以及在许多情况下在国际法庭前的欧洲投资者提起的众多诉讼所淹没。其中一些案件涉及成员国向投资者提供的国家援助,当这些国家援助措施被撤销时,根据欧洲机构的决定,受害的投资者转向了欧盟和国际仲裁。欧盟的这些决定迫使中东欧国家采取某些措施,通常是减少中东欧国家授予国际或西欧投资者的合同权利。投资者试图使欧盟委员会在欧盟初审法院/普通法院以及随后在法院进行的裁决无效。如果这些举措失败了,这些案件的事实随后便在国际论坛上被许多投资者所代表,例如国际和解投资争端中心(ICSID)或根据贸易法委员会规则进行的仲裁。\ ud

著录项

  • 作者

    Kende, Tamás;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 hu
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号